Why NO ONE makes a Documentary about BAYON Temple – The Forbidden Documentary | Praveen Mohan

Hey guys, today I am gonna show you a very strange temple. No, this is not Angkor Wat, many people think this is part of the Angkor Wat temple, but this is a different temple in Cambodia known as the Bayon Temple, a very large temple with many intriguing features.  I am sure you have seen pictures of these mysterious stone faces at least once, but here is the shocker: No documentaries have ever been made about this temple. This is very very odd, because such a fantastic ancient temple should have plenty of videos and tv programs made about it. But there is nothing, I could not even find a documentary on YouTube. And I found a shocking reason why no documentaries can be aired on any TV channel about this temple. So welcome to the first and the only documentary about Bayon Temple.

According to Historians, the Bayon Temple was built as a Buddhist temple, these mysterious faces represent Buddha and it was built around 800 years ago. Even before you enter the Bayon temple, when you are driving towards the gate, you see these giants figures lined up on both sides of the road. Who are they? On one side, there are Gods called devas and on the other side, there are demons called Asuras and look at what is in their hands, the body of a giant snake. What are they doing with this serpent? They are churning the sea of milk. But this event is mentioned in ancient Hindu texts, not Buddhist texts, in fact Buddhism shuns features like this. So why does a Buddhist temple have a Hindu depiction outside its gate?

When you enter the Bayon temple, you realize it has a very unique visual impact. It is built completely different from any other temple in the world. There are a total of 54 towers cramped together, and each tower has multiple smiling faces embedded on them. There are a total of 216 faces on these towers. The faces may look small from the ground level, but when you go to the top level, it is just breath taking. You will become speechless for a few seconds because the giant faces with that mysterious smile give off a strange vibe.

Who does this face belong to? Why did ancient builders construct this temple with so many towers with these strange faces embedded on all sides? Archeologists and Historians say that this face depicts Buddha, and also the King Jayavarman the 7th, and he wanted to glorify Buddha and he wanted people to remember himself forever. This is why he built this temple, to establish the glory of Buddha and Himself, to turn himself into a God King.

But this entire theory is completely WRONG. These faces do not depict Buddha or the king, these faces depict the Hindu God Brahma. Brahma is the God with 4 heads, not Buddha. This is why every tower is shown with 4 heads or faces, facing 4 different directions. Ancient Hindu texts clearly mention that Brahma should be shown with 4 heads facing 4 different directions, on the other hand Buddha is never shown with 4 faces.

Even more interesting, look at the ornaments, he is wearing a spectacular necklace, He wears very ornate Ear Drops and he is wearing more jewellery on his head. This is completely against Buddha, because Buddha never wears Jewellery, he believed in simplicity. Even more important is the giant crown, it is a large conical helmet like headdress with a crown  or a diadem at the top. There is an ancient sanskrit text called Manasara-Silpasastra which clearly explains how Brahma should be carved, and the ancient builders have built Brahma exactly as per this text. Again, Buddha is never shown with a giant headdress and a crown, he is shown with simple hair do.

But there is another fascinating detail: Look how he is shown with a Third Eye. Most people think only Shiva has a third eye, but Brahma also has a third eye, this is also mentioned in ancient texts. This means that ancient Cambodian sculptors had thorough knowledge of ancient Hindu texts, and they followed all the details carefully. This is stunning because even ancient Indians omitted these details some times, but they have dutifully followed it thousand miles away from India.

But if this is a temple dedicated to God Brahma, why is it called Bayon temple? What is the meaning of Bayon? When the French occupied Cambodia they called it the Banyan temple, because it looks like a cluster of towers, and locals mispronounced Banyan as Bayon and the name stuck. 

Archeologists confirm that ancient inscriptions call this temple JayaGiri. This is actually perfect because you know what Jayah means in Sanskrit? It means Brahma, it is one of the names, an epithet of Lord Brahma, and Giri means mountain, so this was built as the mountain of Brahma. And now when you look at this temple again, it is a perfect name because it looks like a mountain, and when you look at the 4 heads everywhere you are immediately reminded of Brahma.

Archeologists also agree that small shrines for Shiva and Vishnu have been built in the temple, but they have not found a Shrine for Brahma. Why? Because this entire temple is dedicated to him, that’s why.

It is quite surprising that archeologists and historians think that this is a Buddhist temple dedicated to Buddha while it is clearly a Hindu temple dedicated to Brahma. What is the reason for this? I attribute this to the French authorities who did not understand much about Hinduism and Buddhism. Also, when the French colonized Cambodia in 1863 , Buddhism was the prevalent religion here. So at that time, they must have automatically assumed that this is a Buddhist temple. And another interesting point is that this temple, just like Angkor Wat was continuously occupied by Buddhist monks for many centuries. They had also created many small scale Buddhist carvings, and they sometimes even buried statues of Buddha for good luck in the temple premises. And this can be quite confusing for a western archeologist while studying the temple because you are going to see Buddhist carvings and sometimes even unearth Buddha statues. So you are going to see Buddhist carvings, along side Hindu carvings, and you are going to see Buddha statues standing next to Hindu statues. And even more interesting, you see plenty of alterations because when these 2 groups were fighting for supremacy they would have obviously tried to alter some carvings and also destroyed some.  

But the key detail is this: While anyone can make micro carvings to alter your perception, no one can change the macro carvings. The 4 faces on the top of every tower clearly represent Brahma, not Buddha. In fact, the same builder built another Brahma temple called ‘Ta Prohm’ nearby. This is why this temple is full of beautiful women carved all over the walls, because Hinduism embraced worldly life, unlike Buddhism. This is why you see the Hindu Gods and Demons churning the sea of milk at the gate. And this is why you will also notice countless other Hindu Gods in this temple. So, as much as Cambodian authorities would like to see it as a Buddhist temple, it is not true, this was originally a Hindu temple.

But am I really the first person to figure out that this is a Hindu temple and these faces represent Brahma? I don’t think so, I suspect that big channels like history tv or discovery channel would have already examined this temple, and they might have figured this out, but if they come out and say it on TV, then the authorities here may not give them permission to film future projects in Cambodia. I think this is why no documentaries exist about this fantastic temple. But I believe that this video, this documentary, will be a stepping stone for others to move forward.

–Praveen Mohan

A BED Made of ARROWS? Strange Battlefield Details at Ancient Angkor Wat | Part 10 | Praveen Mohan

Hey guys, today I am going to show carvings of battlefield in Angkor Wat. The walls showing battles stretch for more than a kilometer in this temple and they show some strange details.

In real battles right, things get very complicated. It is not like a one-on-one combat, so thousands, possibly millions of people were involved in ancient warfare, right? So look at what is going on here, so this guy is fighting this guy, right? So these 2 guys are fighting and you see this guy has a shield and this guy is having a spear. But look what this guy is doing, right? This guy behind this guy is holding this guy’s back, making sure .. he is trying to pin him down, right? Now what is happening to this guy? This guy in front of him has locked this guy’s arm? and this guy behind this guy is possibly trying to kill this guy. See how many little things are going on in this battle. This guy is fighting this guy, but this guy is attacking this guy, this guy has locked this guy and this guy is possibly attacking this guy. So it is like a street fight basically so all these details are seen here and in the middle of this fierce battle you saw something quite different, they seem to have a different facial feature. Look at these guys, how these guys look and look at the face of these guys.

They are mostly bald and they have these weird hairdo and you may wonder why and what are these strange guys doing in this fierce battle? All these guys are playing music in the battle. This guy, look at this guy’s hairdo and he is wearing small drums. See what this guy has, he has a stick, in his hand to beat the drum.

Look at this guy, he is playing a Conch. Possibly to sound the start and stop of the battle, and here you can see these guys blowing a long bugle. These guys look deliberately different. Look this guy is wearing a small drum, a percussion instrument. These guys look deliberately different because they don’t want to die. They don’t. They want to make sure that these guys, you know all these guys who are fighting should not mistake these guys as soldiers and kill them right? So these guys are deliberately dressed different with strange hairdo and they are playing music in the middle of the battlefield and then here as well we see people who are playing. I am pretty sure.. look.. this guy is actually beating the drums and their hairdo is deliberately made different from these guys. Look at their hair here and the hair of the actual warriors, they look deliberately different but what’s more interesting . Here these guys are carrying something, possibly food or medicine. So even though you know there is a fierce battle going on and all the stuff, you still see how organized the ancient people must have been you know. There is music playing and then there is like things being transported into the battlefield, just like Red Cross. Possibly carrying medicine or food, these guys were doing all the fringe work also .

You see this guy, right? This guy’s body.. I just wanna be careful and not touch these carvings because I don’t want them to erode more, but look at this body. So this guy’s legs are here and one of his arms is here and his other arm is around this guy’s leg but he is basically locked in like a wrestling position and this guy has caught this guy’s head like this, and then look at what he is going to do. He is basically going to chop off his head . of course with the resources I have, I cannot show it in animation right? But I don’t have to show it in animation because these guys already did it many many centuries ago. So what happened after this scene? This is what happened after this scene. Look the same guy’s body is there and this guy – look what he is doing. This guy has chopped off this guy’s head and he is holding it. So this is like a movie, right? So here you see the first scene and then here you see the second scene. and then there is a third scene. What do you do with that head? Just throw it on the ground. This is how it ended for that guy. Isn’t it beautiful to see all the details like a movie scene by scene, carved many centuries ago?

There is an interesting detail here, look. He is wearing a helmet with an animal motif. And it looks very similar to the Egyptians. The headdress looks very similar to the Egyptians and this is not the only one. Look. Another animal. Another animal. I think these could be eagles. Another animal – looks very similar to the Egyptian.

So was there a connection between Ancient Cambodia and Egypt, even though they are in different continents? Here you can see another interesting detail, no.. not the Rhino pulling the chariot, but look at the driver here, he is shooting a poison dart with his mouth, at a person who is attacking from behind. Now, this is unheard of, nobody knows this was done by ancient Cambodians. We know that indigenous people of Colombia were using poison darts like this. But here, we can see that the ancient Cambodians were also blowing poison darts in warfare. So, again the question is, did ancient Hindus of Cambodia somehow communicate and mingle with ancient Egyptians and Colombians, even though all three countries are in different continents separated by thousands of miles? Not to mention the Indian connection, right? I mean all the events carved here are from Indian texts. Look at this figure, in the middle of the battle field, what is he doing?  All these lines are arrows piercing his body, and he is lying in that bed, made of arrows. Who is he and what happened to him after that?

So I hope you enjoyed some good information from these ancient carvings.

–Praveen Mohan

Ancient Builders Tamed WHAT ANIMAL? Mystery of Angkor Wat Continues | Part 9 | Praveen Mohan

Nearby you can see this guy, is being eaten alive by a lion. I don’t know if you understand how crazy this is. Not only this,  there are gigantic, majestic  stone lions greeting you when you enter Angkor Wat.  I am completely blown away by these Lions while thousands of visitors will just walk by without giving them a second look. They will be like  “nice looking lions”, right? So plot twist: There are no lions in Cambodia, there are no lions in South East Asia at all, not today, not ever. All experts agree on that, what is in red is the historical distribution of Lions. Lions existed historically only in Africa, middle east and India,  and today of course they have diminished even further, which is shown in blue.  But all experts agree that Lions never existed in Cambodia which is like a thousand mile away from India. So how did ancient builders who existed in Cambodia carve these Lions, without ever seeing one?

 

I mean obviously Hinduism comes from India, and they took a lot of information from Indian texts, but in order to carve an animal, they must have visuals. You can read about a Red-lipped Batfish for hours,

, but if you have not seen one, how will you sculpt or draw the batfish?  So this detail is really quite fascinating to me, because if you think about mainstream history, this was carved by Cambodian sculptors using chisels and hammers, you know the standard depiction right? Scantily clad, using primitive tools, they used animal driven carts, so there is really no way for them to travel to India which is more than a thousand miles away. Yet, they were able to carve lions fairly accurately, and even stylize them in Angkor. How is that possible?

Ok, so now it is your turn to tell me how they domesticated Rhinos in ancient times, and how can sculptors living in Cambodia carve lions which do not exist here. The answer may be hidden in the 4 tusked elephant carved at Angkor Wat.

–Praveen Mohan

IMPOSSIBLE ANCIENT MACHINE Found in AngKor Wat? Lost High Technology | Part 8 | Praveen Mohan

Hey guys, today I am gonna show you these extraordinary pillars in the ancient temple of Angkor Wat. You can see right away, that these pillars cannot be made using primitive tools like chisels and hammers, you absolutely have to use a lathe machine, a rotating mechanism to create these pillars, and experts agree that this is not possible using chisels and hammers. I have already shown you large pillars in ancient Indian temples which have been created using lathe technology, but these pillars of Angkor Wat are much more advanced – This is so advanced that it is not even possible to do it today, using the technology we have. I know that’s a big statement, but if you watch till the end of the video, you may agree with me.

Look at the pillars here, there is something very strange about them, yes these marks called turn marks can be achieved only using lathe technology, but look at the other operations here, they did complex processes like thread cutting, this is the only way to achieve several little cylinders in the same shaft, they did another process called chamfering, so one part becomes bulgy while the other part is narrow. Imagine doing these complicated machining at least 900 years ago on solid sandstone blocks.

But ancient builders were not satisfied even after processing them in a lathe machine, after this, they  then carved on the faces of the pillars, there are carvings in millimeters on them everywhere, but all this is not crazy, the real crazy part is that vertical groove. The vertical line that goes from top to bottom. This is impossible to achieve even with lathe technology. You cannot make vertical grooves like this, unless you use another advanced machine like an angle grinder or a circular saw today. But it is not even the vertical groove that bothers me, what is really crazy is that, this line goes from the top to the bottom, and look at the depth of that groove. This is not a fancy groove made for beauty. This is a cut, that was made deep enough to open the pillar into 4 equal halves lengthwise. Look, this is incredible, they made straight, deep lines that go from top to bottom, so they could cut the pillar open into 4 equal halves. We cannot do this today, even with modern technology. This pillar is probably 2 inches wide, imagine taking a cylinder made of sandstone that is just 2 inches wide, cut it into 4 equal halves and put it back together to make it look like one solid piece. We cannot do this today, unless we used computerized machines like CNC machines. 

So, how did they cut solid sandstone lengthwise into 4 equal halves? Even more interesting, how did they glue these blocks back together so it looks like one piece even after so many centuries? Look at the perfect fitting here, this looks like woodwork, but each pillar is made of 4 joined pieces.

This is clear evidence of ancient machining technology, but there is an important question that’s even more mind boggling. WHY? Why did they have to process these pillars in lathes, and then split them up, only to put them back together? It is much easier to just have it as a single piece, rather than cut it into 4 pieces and put them back together. So why did they do this?

Think about it, why would you cut something open, and then put it back together? If there is no need for it, you will never cut it open in the first place. The only reason you will do this, is if you have to put something inside.

Today, we do this all the time when we need to keep something safe. We make a secret hole, put some valuable stuff inside, and then put it back together and pretend it is a solid box, right? We have experts who make so many secret compartments in houses. It will look solid, but if you push a button, or if you use leverage, it will open up. If you see how they make these secret boxes, they take a solid piece, cut it finely, make a small room in the center, and put it back so no one can even tell that it is a container holding something inside. 99% of people will just think it is one solid piece. Is this why these pillars were cut open?

Because there is absolutely no other need to cut this into 4 pieces and then put it back together. So there is definitely something inside.  What is inside? Is it somehow related to the technology that is inside Angkor Wat’s main towers? In a previous video, I already showed you how there was a mysterious “energy box” inside the main tower’s secret chamber.

Now, Why am I connecting these pillars and the main towers? Here is why. All these pillars are located in places where sun shines on them at particular times of the day. When sunlight is not falling on them, you don’t see anything, but when sunlight falls on them, look at the shadow. Do you see what this is? Let me turn this around, what do you see now ? This shadow shows Angkor Wat’s temple towers. Yes, you can actually see the towers of the temple as shadows. If you look carefully, you can see the central tall tower, 2 smaller towers, and you can even see the 2 towers on the sides. I mean this is incredible, this cannot be a coincidence, and these shadows only happen on certain times of the day on certain pillars creating a magical effect.

Is it some type of a symbol or a code pointing to an advanced technology hidden inside some of these pillars? Why else would they make such complex structures and make them even more mysterious by making the shadow in the shape of the towers?

If you walk around the temple, you can see that each window is being guarded by these celestial beings called Apsaras. In most other Hindu temples, these guardians are shown protecting the main chamber, or major Gods, but in Angkor Wat, these guardian angels are shown protecting these pillars. What is so precious hidden inside that they need to be guarded? Why were these pillars created?

I am sure some engineers will laugh at this question, right? I mean windows, by definition are built to let air and sunlight in, and these pillars are decorative elements. But look at this one. They made the lathe pillars, but on the other side, it is closed. And look here. And look at the entire stretch. It is all completely closed using sandstone blocks. So these pillars were definitely not made as decorative elements and these were not made as windows for sunlight or air. So, what is the actual reason for making these pillars?

One thing is very clear. The ancient builders definitely used advanced machining technology. They used lathe machines, they knew how to cut stone blocks like pizza and they knew how to put them back together. But we don’t know the answer to the most important question: What is hidden inside these pillars?

–Praveen Mohan

This is Inside The Stone Blocks of Angkor Wat? Ancient Engineering Technology |Part 7| Praveen Mohan

Hey guys, today we are going to solve the puzzle of  Angkor Wat’s Stone Work. In a previous video, I had estimated that Angkor Wat would have needed at least 10 Million tons of sandstone blocks to build the temple. As you can see, Angkor Wat is entirely made of sandstone, and it is so big that it would have needed at least that many rocks. But there is a fundamental problem with this, if you look at the quarry sites of Angkor Wat, we can be sure that 10,000,000 tons of rocks were not removed from here. And experts confirm there are no other sandstone quarries nearby from which the rocks have been taken. So where did ancient builders magically get these sandstone blocks from? If you watch till the end of the video, you will know.

“So that is where the tourists are, that is where the main temple is. This is almost the edge of the temple but this is where all information is. See this is sandstone, this is this rock basically. You can see the blocks that were used to make this temple. I don’t think these were leftovers. These are parts taken out and put here. So you can see these blocks of sandstone – this is what the entire temple is made of. These are the sandstone blocks that made the temple and you can see a bunch of them here and there is a pile of blocks which goes all the way and this is all sandstone. These are sandstone blocks, parts of pillars, I can tell right away, some make up the other structures. But you see those rocks there, that is where it gets really interesting. Can you see the difference between that rock and this rock? This rock is sandstone but that is not sandstone. I think that is volcanic basalt, that’s – Cambodians call this Lava Rock, you see how porous it is. Let us go take a look and see how this was used. See how these rocks are, right? You can tell right away that you cannot put these rocks as front pieces of a temple right? Because you see how porous they are and how rough they are. If they are carved, this is not going to look good. But why do you see these huge rectangular blocks right? You can see how many blocks here right? This entire area is full of these “Lava Rocks”. But these rocks were also used in the construction of the temple. Nobody understands this, people think it is made of sandstone but these rocks were key to the construction of the Angkor Wat temple. So let’s go take a look and see where these were used. “

We are on the other edge of the temple, you can see tourists and tour guides walking into the temple, but remember, the information is always in places where people do not look. So I start exploring the woods nearby, normal people do not venture into this area.

And you can see something very exciting, the Angkor Wat temple is not only protected by a moat, but it has a giant compound wall, not only now, even a thousand years ago, most people would not visit this area, but this giant temple is protected by a 16 foot wall on all 4 sides. But the most important feature is the material used here.

“So this where the lava rocks were used. There is no need for dressing this up, there is no need for this compound wall to look beautiful, it was created for protective purposes, and this is why we have blocks and blocks of lava rocks. You can tell – it is not beautiful, but it will absolutely serve the purpose. And we are able to find this only if we go deep, where there is nobody. “

This material is called basaltic laterite, and it is created as a result of volcanic eruption. I examine this wall which stretches for miles, and when I start returning back to the main premises, something hits me, this wall made of laterite does not solve the mystery of Angkor Wat’s  volume of rocks. This wall probably accounts for 1 percent of Angkor Wat’s stone blocks. So, just because I found out that this 1% is made of laterite, it does not explain where 99% of the rocks, the sandstone blocks came from.

Ok, now let’s go into the main temple complex, and everywhere you see, is made of solid sandstone blocks. The blocks are smooth and are full of carvings. They would have needed an entire mountain of sandstone, to cut these blocks and make up this structure which is more than 200 feet tall. And then I observe something crazy. Do you see what’s going on here?

“So here you can see we are on the main complex of Angkor Wat and these are all sandstone blocks as you can see and look inside – the volcanic basalt rocks are inside. So the sandstone blocks are only used as a dressing because they are easy to carve and they look great but look what is actually inside. That is the volcanic basalt but “Lava Rock” as it is known in Cambodia and this is how such a massive temple was built. It was built mostly using the volcanic rock, and the sandstone, the structure or stuff you see everywhere is just a dressing.”

 Let’s look at the top of this structure, yes it has undergone many centuries of destruction, but you can still see the smooth surface, and you can see beautiful carvings on it, and appreciate its beauty. But, as you look below, suddenly, you are having a change of heart. Suddenly you don’t think this is a beautiful structure, you feel like it is not so good looking. Why? Because earlier you were looking at a super model, but now the skin is peeled off, and you are looking at the flesh and blood of the supermodel. That is exactly what you are looking at, right now. The skin, was the Sandstone, but the flesh and blood, is not sandstone, a majority of this temple is NOT made of that smooth sandstone, but this rough, orange colored, not so good looking material called Laterite. 

Now we understand why the quarry sites do not show 10 million tons of sandstone blocks removed from there. Because, the ancient builders did not use sandstone 100%, the sandstone was only the skin of Angkor Wat, imagine a human body and what percent of the human body would the skin be, okay?So sandstone is not the major ingredient, but now the question is, what about the laterite quarry? From which mountain did they quarry these laterite blocks, where did that come from?

If you look at the laterite quarries, they are usually found on the ground level itself, and my guess is that the ancient builders would have found laterite very close to the temple site itself. This would have not only eliminated the problem of long distance transportation, but  also explains why the sandstone quarry sites do not show a massive removal of rocks.

But I have done something spectacular today, I have now peeked into the mind of ancient builders. Ancient builders wanted us to think the entire temple is made of beautiful sandstone blocks, you have already seen 6 videos about Angkor Wat on my channel, and you would have also believed that. Ancient builders wanted to fool us, they only used sandstone blocks as an outer covering, the sandstone is smooth, you can carve on it, and it will look good. But Sandstone is not available locally, it is found 30 miles away from Angkor Wat, so, they filled up the insides with laterite which was available locally. It is rough, it looks ugly,  it cannot be carved, but it is basically used like filling material like modern day packing peanuts, and then completely dressed with sandstone on the outside.

And ancient builders must have thought that visitors will never venture into the woods and observe these remote walls, this is why they put laterite rocks here. Had they known, that some crazy guy would come and explore this area many centuries later, they would have dressed this wall with beautiful sandstone blocks, and then made carvings on every inch of this wall also.

So is the temple made of just Sandstone and Laterite? No, there is yet another secret ingredient inside. If you open up the temple, outside you will see sandstone blocks, inside you will see laterite blocks, but if you open that, you will see something pouring out. What is that? Sand. Yes, Sand.

In a previous video, I showed you how the moat was constructed around the temple with a perimeter of nearly Three and a Half miles and a depth of 12 to 25 feet.  Where did such a huge volume of sand, removed from this place go? It was conveniently dumped in the center, where the temple is. So ancient builders were doing something ingenious, on one hand they were creating a moat, on the other hand, they got all the dirt they needed to build the Angkor Wat. A massive flat top pyramid exists inside, completely made of sand. First, the core structure was made of sand and it would have been interleaved with laterite blocks for stability. Remember I told you that laterite was like flesh and blood. The sand was the skeleton. After that, the laterite blocks were added, and the sandstone blocks were added finally as the outer skin, and the carvings are the makeup, which ultimately makes Angkor Wat look so beautiful.

One thing is clear, this temple was not built by primitive, unsophisticated people, this kind of complex engineering needs extraordinary intelligence, they knew exactly what materials to use, where to use them, how to put them together, how to package it, and deliver it as a master piece.

–Praveen Mohan

108 SECRET LINGAMS Hidden in Angkor Wat? Ancient Energy Machines Revealed |Part VI | Praveen Mohan

Hey guys, today I am going to show you the secret Lingams of Angkor Wat Temple, nobody has posted this information anywhere, this is not on YouTube, and this is not even in any book, these lingams have never been observed before.

When you walk around these passages they have a lot of Buddha statues placed all around. Some Buddhas are huge, and some Buddhas are small, and some of them have even been destroyed, and it is said that 108 Buddhas were placed originally all around like this, in this temple. But this is strange because Angkor Wat was originally built as a Hindu temple, and 108 is a sacred number of Hindus, so why would the original builders place 108 Buddha statues here?

Let us examine this mystery, and here you can see this Buddha statue, its head  is broken. Now, Buddha is already seated on a Naga, a snake, and he is placed on a pedestal or a base. To a casual observer, there is nothing wrong, but there is something very weird about the base, it does not fit the Buddha at all. You can see that the base is square, and there is a groove, an outlet for the water. “THIS IS THE BASE OF A LINGAM FOR THE WATER.” This is the base of a lingam for the water to flow. I have shown you a lot of lingams like this, and how they have these spouts or outlets for water. And look, the Buddha statue is completely separate and it is not even seated on the base properly. 

So, where is the lingam? Where is the cylindrical part that once sat on this base? It is sitting right here, you can see a part of the broken cylinder, this was the lingam which originally stood on the base.

And here is another Buddha, this Buddha is much smaller than the base, and you can see the full base of the lingam here, how a lingam would have been originally placed. The cylinder top represents Shiva, and it has been specifically destroyed, and a Buddha has been placed on top, even though it does not fit this base at all.

May be, this is true only for small Buddha statues, what about the Giant Buddha statues placed in Angkor Wat? Look at this one, this Buddha is more than 8 feet tall, has a huge 7 headed naga guarding him, while he is in deep meditation. This is such a fantastic statue that even as a visitor, you want to pay respect to this Buddha. But look at the base. It is obvious that it is not at all a part of the Buddha statue. And you can see this rectangular groove for water outlet. There was originally a lingam here, and when the civilizations changed, the lingams were destroyed, and these Buddha statues were just placed on top of them.

I have examined at least a dozen of these Buddhas, and it is a very interesting modification to watch, when the temple was taken over by a different religion, they just removed the cylinders, but they kept the bases and placed the newer Buddhas on top of these bases. But this is not a very well engineered modification, in almost all cases, the bases look completely different than the Buddhas.

Okay, so you have now seen the 108 lingams inside Angkor Wat temple, But these are not the lingams I wanted to show you, I want to show you the SECRET LINGAMS that have been hiding underground for many centuries.

In 2015, researchers used laser scanning equipment called Lidar attached to low-flying helicopters and scanned the Angkor Wat area. And they were shocked to find a large field full of cylindrical projections hidden around the temple complex. Archeologists are calling them ‘Domes’ because they are cylindrical structures with nice smooth tops, these are obviously lingams. But it is not just the buried lingams that have stunned scientists, it’s the sheer volume of them. They have found vast fields full of these lingams arranged in grid like fashion, forming a large matrix. Experts confirm that these ancient structures were built around the same time as Angkor Wat temple.

Why were hundreds of these lingams built all around Angkor Wat temple complex? Why did ancient builders build such a large number of lingams both inside and outside the temple walls? These lingams are debunking all mainstream theories. Experts have always argued that there is nothing special about Lingams, they are just statues people built, hoping that others will come and worship these lingams and give donations. But these lingams found by Lidar technology is proving this wrong, if lingams were built only for worship and donations, why would they make these hundreds of lingams in a grid like fashion and place them outside the walls of Angkor Wat? These lingams must have been used for a specific reason.

It has been 5 years since these lingam grid has been discovered, but even today, experts say that the purpose of them is unknown, and have called this the most enigmatic feature of Ancient Cambodia. But we know what will eventually happen, they will claim that these were just random earthen mounds created for religious reasons. We cannot expect any other outcome from mainstream theorists.

But what if I told you each of this lingam in the dome field was not only planned carefully, and constructed with accuracy and precision, but also was absolutely necessary for the construction of Angkor Wat? These secret lingams were a part of the blueprint of Angkor Wat temple.

Wait, did I just say blueprint of Angkor Wat? Where is that blueprint now? It’s on top of a mountain called Phnom Kulen about 50 kilometers away from Angkor Wat. Here, you can see a square in the middle, and inside that square, you can see 5 lingams or domes. Now compare this with the 5 domes of Angkor Wat. There is one in the center, and 4 around the central dome. Exactly the same layout. Not only that, the square is not complete, it has a narrow extension reaching out, this is the causeway that connects the main temple with the outside area. And you can see the moat in the blueprint, it is a large strip between the inside and outside. There is no doubt that this is the blueprint of Angkor Wat, but all these details are not important. The most important part is the vast Lingam Grid carved around the temple. It clearly lays out that there were hundreds of domes carved all around it like a matrix, and they must have been an integral part of Angkor Wat, because otherwise they would not have been carved here. 

I had visited this blueprint back in January, and I already observed these carvings and recorded my observations at that time, let’s take a look at that  ” There are 5 small lingams in the middle and around it there is like a rectangle.. We are gonna have to decode this..Why did ancient builders create amazing carvings one thousand years ago underwater. People will say this is merely for religious purpose, but there must be a scietific reason behind this, and we need to find out why they did it “

But at that time, I did not read the Lidar reports, so I did not have an answer for these lingam grids. Now, lidar technology reveals that this entire place was a small scale model of Angkor Wat, accurately filled with these lingams and it is not just lingams, in some places, there are just holes, not protrusions, they are negative lingams or inverse lingams. Today, Lidar technology is revealing the same pattern, there are these giant domes, but there are also depressions in some places. What were they doing with these lingams, why were they created as an integral part of the temple?

Today we think this is the Angkor Wat temple, and this is just the woods and the new city around it. This is not true, there are hundreds of lingams placed carefully, all around the structure we see today. These lingams were an integral part of the ancient temple, and we can understand that from the blueprint of Angkor Wat temple.

But why did the ancient builders have to go 50 kilometers from the location of Angkor Wat and carve the blueprint here on top of this mountain? Because this is the place where ancient builders planned, blueprinted, and decided to build Angkor Wat. Archeologists confirm that the stones, the millions of sandstone blocks used in Angkor Wat are originally from here, they were cut and transported from this very mountain. Today, this mountain is called Phnom Kulen, but the original name of this mountain was Sahasralinga, meaning the land of one thousand lingams. And this mountain has several areas where the entire river bed is completely covered with these “mysterious lingam grids”, here you can again see the blueprint of Angkor Wat, a square within a square connected by a causeway and completely surrounded by these vast lingams. I have even shown you underwater footage of these lingam grids before.

Ok, so I have finally shown you all the forgotten lingams both inside and outside the temple walls,  but the real question is: Why? What were the ancient builders doing with these lingams? Why did they want to build all these lingams in a grid like fashion all around the Angkor Wat temple? Perhaps, the real answer can be found if we find the 8 lingams submerged in the middle, deep in the water of this moat of Angkor Wat.

–Praveen Mohan

THIS is inside the MAIN CHAMBER of Angkor Wat? Evidence of Ancient Technology |Part V| Praveen Mohan

Hey guys, there are thousands of videos on YouTube about Angkor Wat Temple, but none of the videos show you what is actually inside the main chamber of Angkor Wat. Nobody shows you that, because it is a big secret! In this video, we are going to find out what is in the main chamber inside this main tower, and it is very shocking, and it has some mind boggling stuff hidden inside.

The main tower is positioned at the very center of this large temple and the tower is more than 200 feet tall. I am finally at this area where the central tower is located, and I begin climbing the stairs, the main tower has quite an elevation and the stairs are very steep making you wonder why ancient builders made it very hard to climb this. As I reach the end of the stairs, I cannot wait to go and see what is inside the main chamber. As I go closer, I can feel a strange pull and I remove my shoes before going near it. 

But when I finally go towards the main chamber,  I am shocked to see a Buddha in the main chamber. A giant Buddha carved on the wall. This is very strange because, Angkor Wat is a Hindu temple with a lot of Hindu carvings, yet in the central chamber we see a giant Buddha statue. Why?There is also a reclining Buddha statue in the front. This does not make any sense, so I walk around and see if there is anything else I can find. As I walked over to another side, there is another entrance, and again I see a similar Buddha inside. This is a different statue, but this also shows Buddha. There are a total of 4 giant Buddhas carved in 4 different directions in the main chamber, there are no Hindu statues here at all. This clearly proves that Angkor Wat is not a Hindu temple, but a Buddhist temple. In fact, even today, many Cambodians actually believe that this is a Buddhist temple.

But then, look at the top of Buddha, you can see important Hindu Gods like Shiva and Brahma carved as guardians of Buddha, you can see them carved much smaller in size as protectors of this Giant Buddha.

This is pure craziness. So, I go to the side of this chamber, and something is very strange here, you see these blocks? This is terrible stone work, this was definitely not done by the original builders of Angkor Wat, some civilization came later and then did not even know how to cut and carve the rocks properly.  Look at the stark contrast between these extraordinary carvings on the side done by the original builders, and the terrible alignment of stones nearby, who came later. You can see the quality of work of 2 civilizations side by side. But the real question is, why? Why did the inferior civilization pile up the stones here, what was the need to do this? Think about, why did the people who came later, decide to build a wall here?

In some places, you can even observe that there is an empty space behind the wall, the wall was built to hide something that was originally behind it. What are they hiding from us?

Now, let’s go back to the main chamber, look at the rectangle around the Buddha, does this ring a bell? Look at the top, it looks remarkably similar to an entrance or a doorway. There is no need to have a tapering rectangle background before carving the Buddha. Even more strange, look at the stone blocks behind, you can see the stone blocks are very crudely aligned, and the Buddha himself looks very low quality, all 4 Buddha carvings pretty much look like that.  Here you can literally see how many stone blocks were used to make this Buddha, and you can see the mortar joining the blocks. In other chambers, a lot of paint is applied crudely on the wall to cover up these terrible joints.

The truth is, this wall, the Buddha statue, the crude blocks outside are all newer structures which were built in front of the original main chamber. The place where you see the Buddha today, that was the entrance to the main chamber. Not only one entrance, originally, the main chamber had 4 entrances on 4 sides, and when this temple was taken over by another civilization, they covered all the 4 entrances with crude walls, and carved Buddha on these 4 walls. Not only that, they also covered the smaller windows outside or any other places which would give away that there was originally a main chamber which contained something very, very important. This is not a theory, this information is actually confirmed by the archeology department of Cambodia.

So what was inside the original main chamber? Usually Hindu temples have a statue in the main chamber, and this temple also had a statue, this giant statue of Vishnu was placed originally in the central chamber,  and then they threw it outside and now it is placed near the entrance of Angkor Wat.  Normally, I would explain how brilliantly this is carved with one block of sandstone, how many hands it has and so on, but not today, because they found something much more shocking in the main chamber.

When they looked up, there was a hole on the center of the tower, but they found something even more weird, when they looked down on the floor. They found a hole that goes deep underground.  How deep is this hole? It is 90 feet deep and it goes to a secret underground chamber. And inside this underground vault, there was originally a stone box. Archeologists observed that around noon time, sunlight was directly shining through this hole on top of the tower, through the 90 feet shaft and hitting the stone box in the underground chamber. Now, archeologists only found fragments of this box, okay? Because the original box was looted and nobody knows where it is now. 

This is mind-blogging, but here is the problem. How do we find out what the box looked like, and more importantly what was inside the box? Obviously this box is gone now, but there is another temple in the same area, which has a similar box. This is not a well known temple, it is called Banteay Samre temple, Even locals do not visit this temple much.  But it has a similar stone box that is considered sacred and some people even worship this today. They have looted the contents of this box, so it is empty now. The box at Angkor wat temple is completely gone and there is a very good chance that it looked exactly like this one, so let’s just imagine that this box was inside the underground chamber of Angkor Wat. What was originally inside the box?

Nobody knows, but we all know the standard theory of archeologists and historians, okay? Take Egypt for example, if an empty stone box is found, it is considered a sarcophagus, sort of a coffin or box used to keep the mummified body of the king. The same mindset is used in Angkor Wat as well, experts think that this stone box had the mummified body of the king who built Angkor Wat. Now, this may be a believable theory to a westerner, but Hindus usually burn the bodies, and they do not put them in coffins, and more importantly, it is considered taboo to bring a dead body even close to the temple premises.

And look the box is too small to put a body, less than three feet long, you cannot even lie down in this, you will have to crouch. Why would a king who built the world’s largest temple be put in a crouched position inside this small box? This does not make any sense. And the most important flaw in this theory is this hole on top of the box. It is about 3 or 4 inches wide. This eliminates the possibility that this held a mummified body, because a sarcophagus needs to be airtight, otherwise the body will rot rapidly. So there was definitely not a mummy in the box, but the hole on the box, gives great insight about what was originally inside.

Think about this, right? We already saw there was a hole on top of the main tower to let sunlight in, and then there was a 90 feet hole on the floor in the main chamber which lets that sunlight pass into another secret underground chamber which had a stone box. Initially, we thought that this sunlight was merely hitting the top of the box, but no, this box has a 3 inch hole on top, which makes sure that the sunlight will go in and make contact with what is inside the box. So, whatever was inside the box definitely needed sunlight for some reason.

What’s even more weird, archeologists recently discovered a few turtle shaped stone boxes in the same area. When they opened them, they found crystal quartz stones, silica gel like substance and bronze wires. Is it possible that a device, an ancient device made with the same materials was placed inside the box of Angkor Wat? Why do I think like this? Not only because these boxes were found less than 5 miles from Angkor Wat, not only because this is also a stone box , but more importantly because of that hole which directly lets sunlight in.

Now, think about a very crude solar energy device today. You have a solar panel which will convert light into energy, you will use a battery to store extra energy and you will use wires for the power to be transmitted. This is exactly what they have found in these boxes. Quartz is used in solar panels today, we have silica gel batteries today in the market, and they even found bronze wires needed to connect everything.

In my mind, this is why they designed the whole set up, the tower with a hole on top, the secret underground vault which can receive sunlight through a hole,  they must have used some type of advanced ancient device inside which was powered by solar energy. This is why they placed this device so securely underground after a 90 feet hole.  It must have been a very advanced device, just like today, all top notch devices are maintained secretly by governments and military, commoners do not get access to them for a long time.

There is no doubt that it was an advanced solar powered device, why else would they come up with such a painstaking model, to put a hole on the top of the tower, which will let the sun shine  through for more than 100 feet, into the box? And it is very interesting because the device which was in there must have only depended on Peak Solar Radiation, which happens at noon time. The solar energy is much stronger at noon than sunrise and sunset.

This explains that whatever was inside was solar powered, and this box even has an outlet at the bottom, again proving that this was not a sarcophagus, but it probably had a cooling mechanism  and had to drain the coolant, from time to time. Now, the entire set up would be able to get some rain water also, which would cool the device inside and also safely drain out.

But what were they powering up using this solar energy? Perhaps the answer can be found in the Hand of this broken Vishnu, which is also found at Angkor Wat.

–Praveen Mohan

Was Angkor Wat Built 1 MILLION YEARS Ago? Proof Of Older Civilization | Part IV | Praveen Mohan

Hey guys, today let us take a look at this ancient carving in Angkor Wat Temple that changes everything we know about Angkor Wat. Here you can see a figure riding an elephant, but look, this elephant has 4 tusks. You can see 2 tusks on the left side, and 2 tusks on the right. This is crazy, because we don’t have elephants with 4 tusks today, but, 4 tusked elephants actually existed a long time ago. Experts say these 4 tusked elephants became extinct about 2 Million Years ago. And archeologists say that Angkor Wat was built just 900 years ago. If both these are true, how could the sculptors living 900 years ago, carve an animal that vanished 2 Million years ago? Think about it, if you are a sculptor carving this scene, you would have observed the animal with your own eyes before starting to carve. This is the standard procedure even today, so you can create an accurate carving of its size, and the corresponding size of human riding it, and all its features. But how did the sculptor who lived 900 years ago, see and observe an animal that became extinct 2 Million years before he lived?

Some people who believe in strict models of evolution will obviously be flustered by this carving, and dismiss it as mere imagination, or a mere exaggeration by the sculptor, but believe it or not, a 4 tusked elephant fossil has been found in the same ancient kingdom. In today’s map, this fossil is found in Sulawesi of Indonesia, but during ancient times, this belonged to the same Hindu kingdom which included Cambodia and Indonesia. This 4 tusked elephant has been dated to 2 Million years old, which confirms 2 things, one: such a species actually existed in the same region where Angkor Wat temple is located. Two: these bones are actually two million years old. And this is mind-boggling, because according to mainstream theory, humans did not even exist 2 million years ago, there were no homosapiens at that time, only other apes with primitive brains existed. So why do we see a carving that shows humans and these prehistoric animals together?

Is it possible that Angkor Wat was not built 900 years ago, but built much earlier in time? Before we go into that, let me show you another strange carving. This pillar is full of micro-carvings of various animals, but here, you can see this strange animal. We can clearly see that it does not resemble any animal that exists today. It has a flat snout, strong short legs and a long pointed tail. This animal is almost identical to another extinct animal called Hyaenodon. The Hyaenodon not only had a flat snout, and a long pointed tail, it even had stripes on its body. Look at the carving, even though the entire carving is only one inch long, the sculptor has put stripes on its body. There is no doubt that this is a Hyeanadon, however, these animals also became extinct millions of years ago.

Why do we find prehistoric animals carved in Angkor Wat? If historians are accurate, how could the sculptors who lived 900 years ago have accurately seen these animals which became extinct millions of years ago, and carve them accurately with all their features?

There are only 2 possibilities unless you believe that ancient Hindus were time travelers. The first option is , these animals did not become extinct until 900 years ago, and were roaming freely alongside human beings. Imagine 4 tusked elephants and Hyanodons, the largest ones were 10 feet long, roaming around 900 years ago. If you accept this option, we have to completely revamp the current theory of animal evolution, because these animals became extinct, and slightly different animals came and went and we have to change  a huge chart called evolutionary tree.

The second option is that these animals did become extinct millions of years ago, but human beings also existed millions of years ago. This means that Human beings did not evolve from great apes a few hundred thousand years ago. And we can simply accept that we have not found the fossil remains of ancient human beings. This also changes the evolutionary tree, but it keeps everything else intact, and changes only the tiny branch called humans.

Did humans really evolve from great apes? How solid is this theory? According to mainstream scientists Homosapiens evolved from other species just 200,000 years ago. They have plenty of fossil records to support this theory. But if you ask the question, why couldn’t homosapiens be living half a million years ago, one of the main reasons given, is the lack of fossil evidence. Now ask yourself this important question: Does absence of evidence mean evidence of absence? And it is a good question to ask. Some argue that If human beings lived half a million years ago, then scientists should have found fossils pertaining to that same timeline. But the earth is so large, that we still could find more evidences that human beings were prevalent more than 200,000 years ago.

In fact, this theory that homosapiens are 200,000 years old has been proven wrong after recent findings. Now they have found fragments of human skull and bones in Morocco, and they have dated this to about 3,15,000 years confirming that our species is a lot older than the initial estimate. What is more interesting, they found stone tools with these remains confirming that humans were using tools even 3,15,000 years ago. So, just like that, human existence on the planet, gained 115,000 more years, that is more than 50 percent the initial estimate, okay? So it is better to keep an open mind that human beings are perhaps much older creatures, I mean how do we know that we will not discover fossils of homosapiens that are half a million years old? The earth is so vast that we could find it in the future, and may be human beings are much older.

And a similar problem is being faced by archeologists and historians as well. They had always maintained that human beings only started building big stone structures and made carvings in the last 5000 years. But recent dating in the ancient ruin of Gobekli Tepe in Turkey has shattered all these theories. They found amazing carvings and brilliant stone structures created 12,000 years ago. Archeologists have sheepishly confirmed that these carvings you see are from 10,000 B.C, so now historians and archeologists have admitted that human beings were quite civilized even 12,000 years ago, doubling the initial estimate. Now, they have even accepted that human beings understood complex subjects like geometry, 12,000 years ago.

These new findings lead to a very important question: Is Angkor Wat Temple really 900 years old, or was it built much earlier in time? Is it possible that Angkor Wat was actually built by a much superior civilization that existed many thousand years ago? This is not only on my mind, but many historians have wondered about this. Why? Because Angkor Wat is much much larger than any other temples. While other Hindu temples in Cambodia are dedicated to Shiva, Angkor Wat is dedicated to Vishnu. While all other temples are built facing east, Angkor Wat is the only temple built facing west. If Angkor Wat was in fact built 900 years ago, why didn’t the immediate generations build larger and grander structures? It is humanly impossible to build such a large temple within a span of just 37 years. More importantly, why do we see prehistoric, extinct animals carved on the walls of the temple? Perhaps Angkor Wat was built much earlier in time by very advanced ancient builders. I have shown you my findings in Angkor Wat, but now, it is your turn to tell me what’s going on here. Did these animals roam our planet until 900 years ago? Did human beings exist 2 Million years ago? Were the sculptors time travelers who could go to the past, observe the prehistoric animals and come back and carve them? Were they spiritually gifted who could look into the past? No matter what your conclusion is, one thing is very clear – what we hear from historians and archeologists is not the full picture. There are lots of missing pieces in this giant jigsaw puzzle called history.

–Praveen Mohan

EVERY INCH of Angkor Wat has a SECRET | Evidence of Ancient Technology | Part III |Praveen Mohan

Hey guys, today we are going to take another look at Angkor Wat Temple in Cambodia. We always hear that Angkor Wat is the largest temple in the world, but the real mystery is not that it is the biggest, the real mystery is that also has the smallest carvings in the world. For example, if you look at this pillar, you see that there are carvings which completely cover the entire pillar, but you cannot understand them unless you take a closer look. Because these carvings are very tiny.

And here are carvings of various animals, but look at the details of these carvings, they are so small. For example look at this deer you can even see its eyes, and its mouth opening, this is only a millimeter long. You can see that the entire column is full of these strange little carvings. It must have been quite a task to carve such micro carvings all over this column. But are these tiny carvings found only on this one column?

I start examining the columns one by one, and it is interesting, because each and every column is covered with these micro carvings. Here you can see two birds kissing, in another column you can see a similar depiction where 2 birds are fighting each other. Again, the details are in millimeters, you can see the bird’s eyes, its head plume or topknot, You can see its wings wide stretched and even its tail, and also the legs, complete with talons. All this is carved in an inch or two, and repeated with perfection to create an insane matrix on the pillar.  There are columns which show apes doing various activities, there are micro carvings which show many other interesting patterns which completely fill up the entire facets of the columns. You may not believe this, but every column I look at, is covered with these carvings. This is insane because today, there are a total of 1532 columns in Angkor Wat temple, and all of them have these carvings, and there are also many columns destroyed, and lying on the ground, and they are also covered with Microcarvings. Here is another fascinating detail on the columns, even if they carved deities, they covered the rest of the column with microcarvings, they carved flowers, leaves, and they never left any space empty. Forget about building the largest temple in the world, imagine the task of carving every inch on every column of this temple.

But are these carvings found only columns? As I start getting fascinated by these microcarvings,  I realize that they stretch beyond the columns, they also stretch above, on top as well, if you look at the top beam, even that has these tiny carvings. This is weird, so I start looking around at the walls. And I am shocked, look at the walls. Everything is filled with these carvings. Zoom in and you will see various types of flowers, leaves, creepers, ornamental hangings. It is crazy even to say this, but this is what I am saying: Every inch of the world’s largest temple is covered with carvings. You cannot even find one inch in this entire temple that is blank, that is not carved. So imagine building a temple that stretches for 400 acres and filling every inch with tiny little carvings. This would have been a monumental task. But did they really carve every inch of it?

Here is a giant wall that stretches forever, and right away you can see that it has beautiful carvings all over it. This is just one photograph of a small part of this wall, and in this alone, you can see more than 80 warriors, several gods and a dozen animals carved. Each warrior is doing something unique – one guy is shooting an arrow, another guy is wielding a sword, one guy is using a shield etc. The details are so vivid, you can even see different expressions of anger, fear and even dejection and satisfaction.  How could they carve that much details in such a small area? In the center look at this bird, in one hand he is holding a horse, on the other hand he is holding another horse. I can talk about this all day because the details are insane. The really interesting part is, this is just about 10 feet in length, and these carvings stretch for many hundred feet on this wall alone. Imagine the number of fighters and details carved all over this wall. It is weird because you can understand that  the sculptors did not get enough space to make the carvings they wanted in the world’s largest temple. It almost seems like they had to cram in a lot of  details. Look carefully, do you see any space that is not carved? It is completely filled, the sculptors could not get enough of this. And some of you may think, well this is a battlefield, sculptors wanted to show a very crowded, chaotic battlefield filled with people. But look above the battlefield, look at the patterns carved. This is not the battlefield, they could have left it empty, or at least they could have just made simple designs. But no, they were carving a plant like design with various leaves, on top of that they carved some ellipses, on top of that they have carved like animal faces, on top of that, you can see birds with wings spread out, and it goes on.

But I am not fully satisfied even after observing these walls. I don’t believe that a temple stretching for 400 acres with a pyramidal height of 200 feet can actually be carved every inch. This seems humanly impossible. So I am going to go to the outside of the temple, nobody observes the temple from this point.  You see the base of the temple is raised to 12 feet, above that base, we can see people walking inside the temple and on the walls there are carvings in every inch, but what about the base of the temple itself? Nobody in the right mind, is going to go in the grass and look at the base of the temple. Did ancient builders carve every inch of that base? I am very curious, so I am walking to the base. What do you think? Are there Microcarvings there? As I get really close, I see tiny little carvings completely filling up the base as well. Think about it, nobody is going to walk around here, not only today, even in ancient times, nobody is going to come to this place, and see what is here. Perhaps one in a million visitors would come here and take a look at this area, but even here, the ancient builders did not just carve one pattern repeatedly, they created so many designs. See from the top to bottom of the base, there are so many varieties, I could spend all day analyzing these carvings: Garudas, deities, flower patterns, lines, chakras circles, even animal faces are carved on them, and the bottom is eroded because of nature. So I walk through the entire stretch of this side, and  this is pure insanity, because there is not a single inch left blank. So the ancient builders covered every inch of Angkor Wat with carvings.

Take a minute to think about doing something like this today. Angkor Wat is about 300 times the size of an American football field, it stretches for 400 acres. Let’s take only 25% of this, let’s take just 100 acres let’s ignore the steps on the moat, protective walls etc, they won’t have carvings because they are just accessories surrounding the actual temple. Visualize putting a separate carving on every inch of this 100 acres.  Let’s imagine doing something simple, right? Let us say I want you to make a pizza that stretches for 100 acres. This is impossible, but somehow you manage to make a cheese pizza that’s 100 acres wide. But now, I come to you and I say, good job, you have made the world’s largest pizza, but that’s not enough. Now I want you.. to fill every inch of this pizza with a unique topping. One inch should have mushrooms, one inch should have onions, one inch should have olives and one topping should never repeat anywhere else in 100 acres. Do you honestly think you can do this? This would be impossible even if you are a world class chef. But this is what the ancient builders have accomplished in Angkor Wat. I mean how did they accomplish such an impossible task?

I am getting really frustrated with these ancient builders, now, I am hell bent on finding an inch that is not carved. I mean there should be at least one inch in this entire temple, that is not carved right? So I examine  this  entrance way in Angkor Wat, If you look at the top line, you can see a series of small flower like patterns. Below that you can see a beautiful carving, this is definitely a war scene, eroded a little bit.. but look at the bottom of the same block. They carved even that part with circular patterns. Let us go to the next level, now we are looking at the frame of the entrance. There is a lot of erosion and corrosion because this temple is at least 900 years old, but you can see that even the tiniest strips are carved. These strips are just a few millimeters wide, but they have carved even on those thin strips.

And then, I strike gold. Look at the sides. It is very smooth, there are no carvings. Here you can see carvings on the outside and here also you can see carvings, but the L shape between these areas are completely smooth, they don’t even have one carving. So I was wrong when I said ancient builders carved every inch of Angkor Wat. They did leave some areas uncarved. But Why? This does not make any sense, why would the sculptors be so stupid to carve vertically on top of the entrance where nobody is going to see them, but leave the sides which would be seen by every visitor. The answer lies at the bottom, look here. You see this hole, yes it is eroded, but there is a square hole. Look on the other side, you see this hole? Now let’s look at the top and confirm if there are holes on the top as well. And sure enough, yes there are 2 holes on the top as well. Now we understand why these areas were not carved. Originally, there were 2 door placed in this entranceway, the holes were used as hinges for the doors, and the doors sides would completely cover these 2 areas which are not carved. So the doors would block these 2 areas all the time, so nobody can see these areas. This is why ancient builders did not carve these areas, because nobody will set eyes on them. So what will the people see instead ?They would see spectacular carvings on the wooden doors. This is not just a theory because we do find remnants of these wooden blocks which supported the wooden doors. You see how richly carved this wooden block is, even after all these centuries. Again, not an inch is seen without carvings.  There is no doubt that large wooden doors, richly carved would have been placed in every door way.

So, my initial finding was that every inch of Angkor Wat temple was carved. But that theory is incomplete okay? The ancient builders only carved every inch you can see. If you cannot lay eyes on an inch, If no one can see a particular inch, then the ancient builders did not carve that inch. Because it is a waste of time, to carve even an inch where nobody can see. Look at this area – I told you about these flowers. And these flowers would be seen only when the doors are open, but they carved this area also. Only 1 in a million would observe these by directly looking up, while standing in the doorway. But they did carve this area, to satisfy a freak who is going to observe this. But even in this strip, they did not carve all the way. They left it blank for a few inches here and here because those areas would always be covered by the door all the time, so they will never been seen. Of course, we can go to the next entrance and verify this. And yes, again, from top to bottom, everything is carved except where the doors would have stood.

It is already weird that ancient builders carved every inch of what you can see. But it is even more weird that they did not carve, even an inch of what you will not see. This means, they planned everything with machine like accuracy. They must have had very advanced technical knowledge and skill to do something like this. 

Now, what happened to the ancient wooden doors? Where did they go? The builders of Angkor Wat would have never even imagined that an inferior civilization would come later,  dismantle these wooden doors and wooden blocks and use them for their houses and other selfish purposes. In fact, the World Monument Fund is now trying to put new wooden blocks on the ceiling, all around the temple. They are trying to re-create what the ancient builders originally had. 

Remember I told you, the ancient builders did not even want an inch you see, to be uncarved. But if you look above, the ceiling is not at all carved. Why is this? Why did they leave the entire top area uncarved? Because they originally had a false ceiling, yes they had put a false ceiling all over the temple with richly carved wooden blocks. Of course, the generation which came later completely dismantled them and used them for selfish reasons, not to mention that they also destroyed them because the blocks had Hindu carvings, and the generations that came later did not follow Hinduism. So they also intentionally destroyed these fabulous wooden blocks.

And this is why you will see some pillars which look like they are not carved. This is because of intentional destruction by people. Now, these are Microcarvings, they are only one or two millimeters deep, and you can destroy them  very easily. You can just take a handful of sand, and just rub it on the face of the sandstone, and the carvings will start fading away, and this is what they did. The inferior civilizations did many things like this, they sand filed these blocks, they put their own inscriptions on these pillars to claim it was their work. Some tried to destroy all these pillars unsuccessfully, and they also tried to deface all the Hindu carvings unsuccessfully. But in their defense, it is humanly impossible to destroy every inch of 100 acre area. But the real question is, how was it possible to carve every inch of what you will see in this temple?

In my previous video, I talked about how ancient builders were processing one ton of rock every minute, that one minute also includes carving every inch of that one ton rock. Is this even humanly possible? What happened to those ancient builders? How did that civilization disappear?

–Praveen Mohan

Angkor Wat – Everything You Know Is WRONG! Impossible Ancient Technology| Part II | Praveen Mohan |

Hey guys, today we are going to look at the mysterious Angkor Wat Temple in Cambodia, which has many strange secrets hidden inside. Historians say it was built about 900 years ago with simple tools , but by the end of this video, I think you will agree with me that this is not true at all.

You may have already known that this is the largest religious monument in the world, but how big is this temple?  The temple stretches more than 400 acres, that is more than three times the size of the entire Vatican city, or about 300 times the size of an American football field. So you can imagine the size of this temple. Even if we take out all the walking space and empty land, the sheer area covered by stone blocks is at least 10 Million Square Feet. And we are not  looking at just a 2 dimensional ground area, we have to look at the volume in 3D because it is made of layers and layers of stone blocks, pillars, ceiling, and towers. The Iconic central towers in the middle, which almost look like drill bits, they are still the tallest structures in this city, even after all these years. The central tower is 213 feet tall, and this view is actually printed on the Flag of Cambodia.

So imagine what would be the sheer volume of rocks needed to build a temple which stretches for 10 million square feet and has a pyramidal height of more than 200 feet. If we calculate the weight of all the sandstone blocks which make up this pyramid, we get about 52 Million tons of rock. I have used a calculator to calculate this weight, using the density of sandstone. Now, we have already not included the rocks in the foundation, we have not included the millions of stone blocks going many feet deep in the moat, and the rocks placed around the moat. And that is already 52 Million tons of rock. Now what I am going to do is take only 20% of this number, so this way we know this is a very very conservative estimate, because Angkor Wat is not a true solid pyramid, there are lots of hollow spaces in between. Let us actually take even less than 20%, we will only take 10,000,000 tons. So this way we know at least this much of rocks would have been used to build the temple.

Okay, so why are we calculating the weight of the stone blocks in this temple? Because, archeologists and historians argue that the entire temple was built in just 37 years. You know the standard theory, people using chisels and hammers to build temples.

Now let us assume that these people worked from sunrise to sunset everyday for 37 years. So they worked straight for 12 hours with no breaks, they don’t eat, they don’t even blink, and no rainy days, no war, no festivals for 37 years. That is a total of 162,060 hours. So if you do the math, if you divide the amount of rocks by the number of hours, this is the answer we get, approximately 60 tons.  This means that they would have to cut and place at least 60 tons of rock every hour. This is 1 Ton of rock every minute. So for every minute they have to measure, cut, carve, lift, place and align one ton of rock. This is simply IMPOSSIBLE. We cannot accomplish this even today, even with modern machinery, we have not yet developed the technology to cut, position and polish one ton of rock of every minute. That is more than 2000 pounds of rock every minute, or 1000 kilograms every minute.

But there is something even more bizarre about this temple, there is no rock quarry anywhere nearby. So where did all these rocks come from?  Archeologists have located two different quarry sites from which the rocks have been cut and transported. The main sandstone quarry is from Phnom Kulen mountain which is 50 miles away. So, today, with modern vehicles, modern equipment, and good roads, imagine the amount of time needed to move 10 million tons from a mountain top 50 miles away to this location. Remember how ancient builders processed 1 ton every minute, this one minute must also include transporting these rocks from 50 miles away. So to put the mainstream theory in a nutshell, this is what happened 900 years ago: Every minute, ancient builders were cutting 1 ton of rock from a hill top, transported this rock for 50 miles, measured it, cut it, lifted and aligned it, polished it and even carved on this one ton block. All this happened within that one minute, and they were doing this without even blinking for a second everyday for 37 years. Do you honestly think this is possible?

The standard archeological theory is very conventional. You take a lot of elephants and bullock carts, and a lot of slaves. You cut the rocks from the mountain using primitive tools, move them using elephants on land, and put the stones on primitive boats and move them in water, again use elephants on land and reach the temple location. If this is how they worked 900 years ago, looking at the sheer volume of rocks in the temple, it would have taken many centuries to build Angkor Wat. Now we understand why this temple is printed on the Flag of Cambodia, because it a giant mystery.

I have shown you hundreds of ancient temples on my channel, but this temple’s architecture is completely unique, it does not resemble any other Hindu temple in India, and it also does not resemble any other temple in Cambodia. It has 5 unique – drill bit shaped towers in the central structure. There are 12 staircases built around them in perfect angles, all leading into the same central chamber. This architecture is not seen anywhere in the world, which indicates that the builders did not copy from anybody, they were absolute original thinkers. And what is even more strange, none of the future generations even dared to copy Angkor Wat temple, nobody could even conceive or attempt to build another temple like Angkor Wat. This is why this ancient temple has remained the largest temple forever, right? Today, humans build a new tallest structure every 10 years. Some country builds the new tallest building, and within a few years, another country will build a structure taller than that. But that has not happened to Angkor Wat, it has remained the largest religious monument for at least 900 years.

Not only is Angkor Wat designed with grandness and originality, it was also built in alignment with the heavens. The original name of Angkor Wat was Parama Vishnu Lokha which means the ‘Sacred World of Lord Vishnu’ and the architect made sure he aligned this temple with the heavenly bodies. Every year, on a specific day, tens of thousands of tourists from around the world come to this city. This day is called the equinox, where the daytime is exactly equal to the night time. All the tourists wake up at four a clock in the morning and rush to the temple to see the sunrise. Why?  Because this is how the sun rises when you see it from the entrance, and this happens only on this day. How could they have calculated and built it with this incredible astronomical precision?

But this is just the tip of the iceberg, the temple is built with so many details about astronomy, we can write an entire book about it. For example, here is the Sun God Surya, he is the personification of the Sun according to Hinduism, but look below him, you see these guys doing Namaste to Surya? Who are these guys? Who depends on the Sun in our solar system? The planets of course. Let’s count the number of guys, and you will count 9 planets including the dwarf planet Pluto. But this is crazy because text books say pluto was discovered only in 1930, less than a century ago, and Pluto cannot be seen unless you have a high powered telescope. Even Neptune, which is the 8th planet from the Sun, is said to be discovered by Galileo only about 400 years ago. Yet, the sun and 9 planets were carved at least 900 years ago in Angkor Wat. How do we explain this? If Angkor Wat was built by people using primitive tools, how did they know about Neptune and Pluto?

The entire temple was built as a giant symbol of cosmology, originally it had a total of 12 towers, symbolizing the 12 signs of Zodiac, but they were destroyed by the people who came later, this is why some of the towers have been flattened.

It is sad to see such a beautiful monument face plenty of destruction. So who built this temple and who tried to destroy it? Archeologists argue that this temple was built by a King called Suryavarman who was a Hindu, and  after his death, he was  immediately succeeded by his own son who became a Buddhist. So the father builds the world’s greatest temple, and what does the son do? The son did Nothing but destroy all the Hindu carvings carved by his own father and created a few Buddhist Carvings. Let’s take a look at the son’s work. Here is the main Buddha statue supposedly carved by the son. But right away, you realize that this is really bad quality carving, you can see the multiple stone blocks, and the stones have not even been joined properly. I refuse to believe that this poor quality work was done by the same builders who built Angkor Wat. Take a look at this pillar, you see how smooth this is, this was built by the original builders and you may think, this pillar is made of one stone, of course you don’t see any joints. But that is not true. Look at this line, this is not one block of stone, it is 2 blocks perfectly aligned.  In fact you see pillar after pillar, tourists wondering about how ancient builders cut these giant stone pillars made of one block, while they are all made of several stone blocks but aligned perfectly. This is the level of quality of the original ancient builders. Now, let us go back to the Buddha statue. This is a terrible alignment, you can literally see all the stone blocks and you sort of have to tolerate this. What is even worse, this is one of the main Buddha statues in the temple, so this is the top quality Buddha they could make.

This raises a lot of doubt about what really happened. According to mainstream theory, there is not much difference in timeline, the father made Hindu carvings, and the son made Buddhist carvings. And it was the same dynasty, it is not like some barbaric invaders came from somewhere else, captured this site, and made terrible carvings, because they did not know how to carve. The son would have had access to the same sculptors and stone workers. Yet, why is this Buddha looking so bad? There is something fundamentally wrong with this theory. It seems obvious that the carvings which were done later,  were created by a primitive group of people, while the original temple was built by a very advanced civilization. It was definitely not built by the same group of people or even their immediate descendants. Many centuries must have passed between these two civilizations.

Forget about the quality, let’s look at the size. Here is another structure, this is a Buddhist stupa built by the primitive builders. Look at the size of this Stupa, and compare it with the size of Angkor Wat. It is a lot less than 1% of Angkor Wat’s size. Look at how basic it is, and it is falling apart because it was not built strong enough. This is  clear evidence that this stupa was not built by the same civilization as the Angkor Wat Temple, it was clearly built by a very inferior civilization which came much later in time. This is the logical conclusion, because the original construction is simply far superior in terms of size, quality and construction techniques.

So who really built Angkor Wat? Was it built 900 years ago, or is it a much older structure? One thing is clear, what we hear from historians is not the full picture. Angkor Wat could not have been built in 37 years using primitive tools. Now it is your turn to tell me how they built it. How was it built? Was it built with advanced technology which would have reduced the time? Did they  build it for many centuries using primitive tools?

–Praveen Mohan